Advertisement
Other| Volume 14, ISSUE 1, P62-67, March 1998

Download started.

Ok

Forage Feeding Behavior of Hereford and Hereford Crossbred Steers During the Summer1

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Two experiments were conducted to study the feeding behavior of steers consuming forage diets during periods of high ambient temperature. In Exp. 1, nine Hereford and nine Hereford × Brahman F1 steers were allotted to each of three pastures in each of 2 yr to study breed effect on behavior. In Exp. 2, nine Hereford × Angus steers were alloted to each of six treatments in each of 3 yr to compare the effect of various conditions on behavior. The six treatments were: pasture with and without shade, an 80% forage diet fed in dirt pens with and without shade and in a partially covered concrete pen, and green chopped Coastal bermudagrass fed in a partially covered concrete pen. Steers were observed and their activity recorded every 2 h from 0600 to 2000 h at 14-d intervals for 140 d beginning in early May. The percentage of Hereford and Hereford × Brahman F1 steers did not differ (P>0.47) due to time of day for grazing, lying, standing, or walking; therefore, breeds were pooled for further analysis. The average percentages of steers in these activities were 47, 32, 20, and 1%, respectively. In Exp. 2, treatment × time of day interactions existed for the percentage of steers feeding, lying, and standing. The average percentage of steers feeding was greater on pasture than on the 80% forage diet (P<0.05). Shade had no effect on average percentage of steers feeding, lying, or standing on pasture or fed the 80% forage diet; but shade did change the feeding pattern. Differences in activity due to observation dates were small and did not appear to be related to temperature or weather. These results suggest that cattle of British breeds and Brahman crossbred cattle can have similar feeding behavior when fed forage diets at high ambient temperature and that shade may not change the average percentage of steers feeding, lying, or standing during the daylight hours when the observations were made.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      Literature Cited

        • AOAC
        Official Methods of Analysis.
        15th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA1990
        • Bailey D.W.
        • Rittenhouse L.R.
        • Hart R.H.
        Effect of forage availability on foraging velocity and biting rate in heifers.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1987; 65 (Abs.).: 216
        • Erlinger L.L.
        • Tolleson D.R.
        • Brown C.J.
        Comparison of bite size, biting rate and grazing time of beef heifers from herds distinguished by mature size and rate of maturity.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1990; 68: 3578
        • Funston R.N.
        • Kress D.D.
        • Havstad K.M.
        • Doornbos D.E.
        Grazing behavior of rangeland beef cattle differing in biological type.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1991; 69: 1435
        • Gary L.A.
        • Sherritt G.W.
        • Hale E.B.
        Behavior of Charolais cattle on pasture.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1970; 30: 203
        • Goering H.K.
        • Van Soest P.J.
        Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications).
        in: Agric. Handbook No. 379 ARS, USDA, Washington, DC1970
        • Hammond A.C.
        • Olson T.A.
        • Bowers E.J.
        • Adams E.L.
        Rectal temperature and grazing time of Senepol and Hereford cows in subtropical environment.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1992; 70 (Abs.).: 160
        • Knox J.W.
        • Humes P.E.
        • Koonce K.L.
        • Babcock D.K.
        Straightbred and crossbred beef cattle performance in Louisiana.
        La. Agric. Exp. Sta, Bull1982 (No. 740)
        • Miller E.C.
        • Shelby D.R.
        • May B.J.
        • Engdahl G.R.
        Grazing behavior of two breeds of cattle on West Central Texas rangeland managed under short duration grazing.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1995; 73 (Abs.).: 129
        • Morrow J.L.
        • Brown D.E.
        Factors affecting grazing behavior of cattle on a mountain big sagebrush site.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1985; 61 (Abs.).: 210
        • Nelson B.D.
        • Ellzey H.D.
        • Montgomery C.
        • Morgan E.B.
        Factors affecting the variability of an in vitro rumen fermentation technique for estimating forage quality.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1972; 55: 358
        • Ngassa C.
        • Hohenboken W.D.
        Grazing and nursing behavior in cattle of different genotypes.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1992; 70 (Abs.).: 164
        • NRC
        Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle.
        National Academy Press, Washington, DC1984
        • Reynolds W.L.
        • DeRouen T.M.
        • Temple R.S.
        • Meyer-Hoeffer D.C.
        Winter feed and growth of Angus, Brahman and crossbred heifers.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1967; 26 (Abs.).: 88
        • SAS
        SAS/STAT® User’s Guide (Release 6.04). SAS Inst. Inc, Cary, NC1990
        • Scarnecchia D.L.
        • Nastis A.S.
        • Malechek J.C.
        Effects of forage availability on grazing behavior of heifers.
        J. Range Manage. 1985; 38: 177
        • Seman D.H.
        • Stuedemann J.A.
        • Forwood J.R.
        • Breedlove D.L.
        • Hildreth D.M.
        Regularity of bovine grazing behavior.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1991; 69 (Abs.).: 229
        • Sheppard A.J.
        • Blaser R.E.
        • Kincaid C.M.
        The grazing habits of beef cattle on pasture.
        J. Anim. Sci:. 1957; 16: 681
        • Shepperd J.H.
        Sweet clover experiments in pasturing.
        North Dakota Agric. Exp. Sta, Bull1927 (No. 211)
        • Steel R.G.D.
        • Torrie J.H.
        Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd Ed. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co, New York, NY1980
        • Turner J.W.
        Genetic and biological aspects of zebu adaptability.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1980; 50: 1201
        • White T.W.
        • Hembry F.G.
        Performance and slaughter characteristics of 1- and 2-year old Hereford and Hereford-Brahman steers grazing Pensacola bahiagrass, Coastal bermudagrass, and Dallisgrass.
        La. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 768. 1985;
        • White T.W.
        • Hembry F.G.
        Influence of shade and supplemental protein and energy on steer performance and digestibility of Coastal bermudagrass diets.
        La. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 807. 1989;