Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 13, ISSUE 4, P170-175, December 1997

Download started.

Ok

Effects of Gathering Time on Weight and Shrink of Steers Grazing Smooth Bromegrass Pastures1

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Two studies having 4 × 4 Latin square designs were conducted to quantify the effect of different gathering times on weight of steers grazing smooth bromegrass pastures. Initial and final weights were measured following a 16-h removal from feed and water. An intensive weighing period followed 3 to 4 d after the initial shrunk weight in which all steers were weighed either at grazing initiation (T0; 0700 h in Exp. 1 and 0615 h in Exp. 2) and 1 (T1), 2 (T2), or 3 (T3) h later on 4 separate d with a 2- to 3-d interval between weighings. In Exp. 1 (September 24 to October 7, 1992), 37 steers were allotted into four replicates. Steers gathered at T3 weighed 7 kg more (P<0.05) than those gathered at T0. In Exp. 2 (June 24 to July 13, 1993), 72 steers from two sources [Kansas State University (KSU) and purchased (P)] were allotted into eight replicates. Two replicates within each source received a control mineral mixture and two received a mineral mixture containing lasalocid (1.3 mg/g). Gathering times were arranged in two Latin squares, one for each mineral mixture. Following the last assigned weighing, steers were held in pens without feed or water and weighed at 2- to 3-h intervals until 1500 h. Weights of KSU steers (calm disposition) were 6 kg higher at T3 than at T0, but weights of P steers did not differ (P<0.10) across gathering times. Steers gathered at T3 lost weight at a slower (P<0.05) rate (percentage per hour) during the first 2 to 3 h following gathering (P<0.05) and by 1500 h (P=0.05) than those gathered at the other times. Gathering time had significant impacts on live weight and shrink of grazing cattle in these studies.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      Literature Cited

        • Brazle F.K.
        The effect of feed additives on shrinkage of calves and yearlings.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1991; 69 (Abs.): 51
        • Brazle F.K.
        Effect of feed additives on shipping shrinkage of yearling heifers.
        in: Cattlemen’s Day 1992, Kansas Agric. Exp. Sta. Rept. of Prog. Manhattan, KS1992: 82
        • Brown M.A.
        • Aiken G.E.
        • Brown Jr., A.H.
        • Jackson W.G.
        • Miesner J.R.
        Evaluation of overnight shrinkage in reduction of variability of weights and gains of beef cattle.
        Prof. Anim. Sci. 1993; 9: 120
        • Cochran W.G.
        • Cox G.M.
        Experimental Designs. 2nd Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, NY1957: 117
        • Coffey K.P.
        • Moyer J.L.
        • Brazle F.K.
        • Lomas L.W.
        Amount and diurnal distribution of grazing time by stocker cattle under different tall fescue management strategies.
        Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1992; 33: 121
        • Grandin T.
        Behavioral principles of livestock handling.
        Prof. Anim. Sci. 1989; 5: 1
        • Grandin T.
        Behavioral agitation during handling of cattle is persistent over time.
        Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1993; 36: 1
        • Heitschmidt R.K.
        Diurnal variation in weight and rates of shrink of range cows and calves.
        J. Range Manage. 1982; 35: 717
        • Hutcheson D.P.
        • Cole N.A.
        • McLaren J.B.
        Effects of pretransit diets and post-transit potassium levels for feeder calves.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1984; 58: 700
        • Moyer J.L.
        • Coffey K.P.
        • Brazle F.K.
        • Schneider J.E.
        Forage intake, diet quality, and performance of stocker cattle grazing interseeded or monocultured rye and bermudagrass.
        Prof. Anim. Sci. 1995; 11: 67
        • Phillips W.A.
        • Cole N.A.
        • Hutcheson D.P.
        The effect of the pretransit diet on the amount and source of weight lost by beef steers during transit.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1983; 57 (Abs.): 405
        • Phillips W.A.
        • VonTungeln D.L.
        • Juniewicz P.E.
        Fecal and urinary output by beef steers during a 48-h fast and fast plus transit.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1991; 69 (Abs.): 51
        • SAS Institute
        SAS/STAT® User’s Guide.
        SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC1988
        • Seman D.H.
        • Stuedemann J.A.
        • Breedlove D.L.
        • Wilkinson S.R.
        • Belesky D.P.
        • Thompson F.N.
        • Stewart F.P.
        Differences in grazing behavior of steers consuming endophyte infected or noninfected tall fescue.
        in: Quisenberry S.S. Joost R.E. Proc. Int. Symp. on Acremonium/Grass Interactions, 5 to 7 November, 1990 Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Baton Rouge, LA1990: 267
        • Snedecor G.W.
        • Cochran W.G.
        Statistical Methods.
        7th Ed. The Iowa State Univ, Press, Ames, IA1980