This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Abstract
Native flood meadows in the northwestern U.S. are typically managed for hay production.
However, management for use by grazing livestock is receiving increased interest.
Irrigation water is primarily supplied by surface runoff from snowmelt occurring at
higher elevations surrounding the meadows. This experiment was conducted to compare
strip (SG) and continuous grazing (CG) effects on livestock diet quality and subsequent
performance. On May 1, groups of 20 steers (253 kg) were randomly allotted to two
replicates of SG and CG treatment pastures (5.6 ha each). Animals in SG pastures were confined by electric fence to an area large
enough to provide approximately 65% utilization after a 5- to 7-d grazing period.
Average strip size was .5 ha, and varied from .23 to 1.15 ha. Herbage allowance was between 305 to 1131 kg/AU under CG, and 72 to 198 kg/AU
for SG treatments, as measured on d 1 in each strip.
Biweekly esophageal extrusa samples and total fecal collections showed that over the
grazing season, average CP of extrusa samples from CG tended to be higher than SG
(P = .14), at 13.9 and 10.9%, respectively. Crude protein declined signifi-cantly between
May and September. Diet IVDDM varied between treatments (P = .07), at 64.6 and 60.7% on CG and SG, respectively. Grasses were more frequent
in extrusa samples from SG than CG (P = .06), at 49 and 35%, respectively. Meadow foxtail was the most common grass on
the meadows and was more frequent in SG extrusa samples (P = .05). Forage intake was similar (P = .42) for both treatments, at about 2.1% of body weight per day. Steers were weighed
biweekly. Steer average daily gain was greater under CG (P = .09) (1.16 kg/day) than SG (.77 kg/day).
Key Words
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe toAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Literature Cited
- Efficiency of forage harvest by grazing cattle.J. Range Manage. 1982; 35: 351
- AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis.in: 14th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists,, Washington, DC1984
- Faecal output and estimated voluntary dry-matter intake of grazing beef cows, relative to their live weight and to the digestibility of the pasture.Anim. Prod. 1987; 45: 23
- A comparison of gains of calves and yearlings when summering on native flood meadows and sagebrush-bunchgrass range.J. Range Manage. 1957; 10: 172
- Trials of multi-paddock grazing systems on veld. 3. A comparison of 6grazing procedures at 2 stocking rates. Rhod.J.Agric.Res. 1977; 15: 129
- Forest-Range Task Force. The nation's range resources.For. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Resources Rep. No. 19. 1972;
- Design and Analysis of Experiments in the Animal and Medical Sciences.Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA. 1978;
- Statistical Methods in Education and Physchology.Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1984;
- Growth and development of meadow plants as affected by environmental variables.Agron. J. 1978; 70: 1061
- Growing meadow foxtail for forage.OSU Ext. Bull. FS264. 1981;
- Nutrition research techniques for domestic and wild animals.Utah State Univ. Dept, of Anim., Dairy, and Vet Sci., Logan, UT. 1970; 1
- Cattle diets in the blue mountains of Oregon, I. Grasslands.J. Range Manage. 1982; 35: 109
- I.A comparison of the production obtained from dose-folding and rotational grazing of dairy cows.J. Agric. Sd. 1950; 40 (Camb.)
- Studies in grazing management. IV. A comparison of close-folding and rotational grazing of dairy cows on intensively fertilized pasture.J. Agric. Sci. 1952; 42 (Carrt>.): 304
- Strip grazing versus paddock grazing under tropical conditions.J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 1963; 18: 69
- Comparison of heifer weight gains and forage quality for continuous and short-duration grazing systems.J. Range Manage. 1985; 38: 144
- The effect of stocking upon a comparison of break and rotational paddock grazing for dairy cows.New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 1959; 2: 707
- Diet and forage quality of intermediate wheatgrass managed under continuous and short-duration grazing.J. Range Manage. 1989; 42: 474
- Heifer nutrition and growth on short duration grazed crested wheatgrass.J. Range Manage. 1988; 41: 259
- Steer and vegetation response to short duration and continuous grazing.J. Range Manage. 1987; 40: 386
- Digestibility of native flood meadow hay at different stages of growth.Proc. West. Sec. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 1964; 15 (LVI)
- Cattle and sheep diets under short-duration grazing.J. Range Manage. 1986; 39: 217
- Production of regrowth forage on native flood meadows.Agron. J. 1963; 55: 245
- SAS. SAS User's Guide. Statistips.SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC. 1987;
- The savory grazing method.Beef Cattle Sci. Handb., Agric. Services Found., Clovis, Calif. 1980; 17: 215
- The relationship of stocking intensity and stocking pressure to other stocking vatiables.J. Range Manage. 1985; 38: 558
- A dynamic approach to grazing management terminology.J. Range Manage. 1982; 35: 262
- Increase prciduction from Wyoming mountain meadows.Wyo. Agric. Ext. Serv. Bull. 1973; : 441
- Forage standing crop and animal diets under rotational vs. continuous, grazing.J. Range Manqge. 1983; 36: 447
- Rotational vs. continuous grazing affects animals performance on annual grass-subclove pasture.J. Range Manage. 1983; 36: 593
- Estimating percentage dry weight in diets using a microscope technique.J. Range Manage. 1968; 21: 264
- Principles and Procedures of Statistics.Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hili Book Co., New York1980
- A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops.J. Br. Grassl. Socr. 1963; 18: 104
- Systems for reducing dependency on harvested fora!ge for wintering cows.Proc. West. Sec. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. Vol. 1987; 38: 197
- II.The amount and chemical composition of herbalge eaten by dairy cattle under close-folding and rotational methods of grazing.J. Agnc. Sci. 1950; 40 (Camb.): 392
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 1991 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
