ABSTRACT
Key words
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe toLITERATURE CITED
Baldwin, R. L. 1995. Modeling Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism. Chapman Hall, London, UK.
- Relationship of chemical analysis to in vitro digestibility for selected tropical and temperate grasses.J. Anim. Sci. 1976; 43: 504-512
- Influence of fermentation method on NDF degradation parameters.J. Dairy Sci. 2008; 91: 1464-147610.3168/jds.2007-041218349240
Box, G. E. P., and N. R. Draper. 1987. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. John Wiley Sons, New York, NY.
- Technical note: A proposed method to determine the extent of degradation of a feed in the rumen from the degradation profile obtained with the in vitro gas technique using feces as the inoculum.J. Anim. Sci. 2004; 82: 733-74615032430
- Effects of size of ingestively masticated fragments of plant tissues on kinetics of digestion of NDF.J. Anim. Sci. 2005; 83: 1602-161515956469
- Models for estimating parameters of neutral fiber digestion by ruminal microorganism.J. Anim. Sci. 2005; 83: 1591-160115956468
Ellis, W. C., J. H. Matis, K. R. Pond, and M. Mahlooji. 1984. Physical and chemical digestion of forage fragments with emphasis on stochastic, heterogeneous rate models. Pages 34–42 in Modeling Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism. Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop. R. L. Baldwin and A. C. Bywater, ed. Dept. Anim. Sci., Univ. California, Davis.
Flatt, W. P., P. W. Moe, L. A. Moore, and P. J. van Soest. 1969. Estimation and prediction of the energy value of feeds for ruminants. Pages 59–65 in Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals. K. L. Blaxter, J. Kielanowski, and G. Thorbek, ed. Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod. Publ. No. 122. Oriel Press LTD, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Goering, H. K., and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures and Some Applications) Agric. Handbook No. 379. ARS-USDA, Washington, DC.
- Comparing relative feed value with degradation parameters of grass and legume forages.J. Anim. Sci. 2008; 86: 2344-235610.2527/jas.2007-054518441075
Hungate, R. E. 1966. The Rumen and Its Microbes. Acad. Press, San Francisco, CA.
Kleiber, M. 1966. The Fire of Life. John Wiley, New York, NY.
- A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.Biometrics. 1989; 45: 255-2682720055
- Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: Collaborative study.J. AOAC Int. 2002; 85: 1217-124012477183
- Evaluation of alfalfa hay by chemical analysis.J. Anim. Sci. 1959; : 1233-1242
Moore, J. E., and D. J. Undersander. 2002. Relative forage quality: An alternative to relative feed value and quality index. Pages 16–32 in Proc. 13th Annu. Florida Rumin. Nutr. Symp. Univ. Florida, Gainesville.
- In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility: A review.J. Dairy Sci. 1988; 71: 2051-2062
NRC. 1981. Nutritional Energetics of Domestic Animals and Glossary of Energy Terms. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.
NRC. 1984. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 6th ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.
NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 8th ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.
- Evaluation of the importance of the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber from forage: Effects on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows.J. Dairy Sci. 1999; 82: 589-59610194678
R Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Found. Stat. Comp., Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
- Brief history of California alfalfa hay TDN equation.Feedstuffs. 2014; 86: 16-17
- Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality.J. Anim. Sci. 1978; 47: 747-759
- Validation of equations used to estimate relative feed value of alfalfa hay.Prof. Anim. Sci. 1996; 12: 162-166
Sapienza, D. A. 2002. Pioneer tripartite method: Linking nutrient content to availability. Pages 27–40 in Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf. Feed Manuf. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
- Preharvest factors influencing quality of conserved forage.J. Anim. Sci. 1978; 47: 712-720
