Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 32, ISSUE 4, P484-494, August 2016

Download started.

Ok

Nutritional strategies used on dairy goat farms in Ontario

      ABSTRACT

      Ontario’s dairy goat industry has grown in recent years. The objective of the present study was to establish the current nutritional practices on dairy goat farms. A survey was sent out to 216 dairy goat producers in Ontario. Producers were asked questions regarding their general herd structure and mortality, voluntary culling reasons, lactation management, nutrition management, housing and space allowance, goat kid management, and opinions on future research. Nutritional practices varied considerably between farms. The most common feeding systems were complete feed (pellet) with forage and component feed for lactating does, dry does, transition does, and doelings. Alfalfa hay was the most common forage fed with the complete feed system. Most producers (84%) fed their goats pellets or grain at the parlor. Milk production was greatest in the summer months, whereas milk fat and protein levels were greater in the fall and winter months. Colostrum management varied between farms. Most producers (36.1%) did not allow goat kids to spend time with their dam. Few farms pasteurized or tested the quality of the colostrum. There was considerable variability when producers offered grain and starter, hay, and water to goat kids, ranging from younger than 5 d to after weaning. Nutrition and kid rearing were the 2 most common areas identified by producers that require further investigation. Future research is essential in providing the dairy goat industry with the information required to effectively meet the needs of the animal, improve production efficiency, and ultimately help support the growth of the industry.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      LITERATURE CITED

        • Argüello A.
        • Castro N.
        • Zamorano M.J.
        • Castroalonso A.
        • Capote J.
        Passive transfer of immunity in kid goats fed refrigerated and frozen goat colostrum and commercial sheep colostrum.
        Small Rumin. Res. 2004; 54: 237-241
        • Baldwin R.L.
        • McLeod K.R.
        • Klotz J.L.
        • Heitmann R.N.
        Rumen development, intestinal growth and hepatic metabolism in the pre- and postweaning ruminant.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2004; 87: E55-E65
        • Battini M.
        • Vieira A.
        • Barbieri S.
        • Ajuda I.
        • Stilwell G.
        • Mattiello S.
        Invited review: Animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment for dairy goats.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2014; 97: 6625-6648
        25242423
        • Blacklaws B.A.
        • Berriatua E.
        • Torsteindottir S.
        • Watt N.J.
        • de Andres D.
        • Klein D.
        • Harkiss G.D.
        Transmission of small ruminant lentiviruses.
        Vet. Microbiol. 2004; 101: 199-208
        15223124
        • Boyazoglu J.
        • Hatziminaoglou I.
        • Morand-Fehr P.
        The role of the goat in society: Past, present and perspectives for the future.
        Small Rumin. Res. 2005; 60: 13-23
      1. CARC (Canadian Agri-Food Research Council). 2003. Codes of Practice for the Care and Handling of Farm Animals: Goats. Accessed Sep. 14, 2015. https://www.nfacc.ca/pdfs/codes/goat_code_of_practice.pdf.

        • Capuco A.V.
        • Ellis S.E.
        • Hale S.A.
        • Long E.
        • Erdman R.A.
        • Zhao X.
        • Paape M.J.
        Lactation persistency: Insights from mammary cell proliferation studies.
        J. Anim. Sci. 2003; 81: 18-31
        15000403
        • Castro N.
        • Capote J.
        • Álvarez S.
        • Argüello A.
        Effects of lyophilized colostrum and different colostrum feeding regimens on passive transfer of immunoglobulin G in Majorera goat kids.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2005; 88: 3650-3654
        16162539
        • DeVries T.J.
        • von Keyserlingk M.A.G.
        • Weary D.M.
        Effect of feeding space on the inter-cow distance, aggression, and feeding behavior of free-stall housed lactating dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2004; 87: 1432-1438
        15290991
        • Douhard F.
        • Friggens N.C.
        • Tessier J.
        • Martin O.
        • Tichit M.
        • Sauvant D.
        Characterization of a changing relationship between milk production and liveweight for dairy goats undergoing extended lactation.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2013; 96: 5698-5711
        23849638
        • Endres M.I.
        • Espejo L.A.
        Feeding management and characteristics of rations for high-producing dairy cows in freestall herds.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2010; 93: 822-829
        20105555
        • Escareño L.
        • Salinas-Gonzalez H.
        • Wurzinger M.
        • Iñiguez L.
        • Sölkner J.
        • Meza-Herrera C.
        Dairy goat production systems.
        Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2013; 45: 17-34
        22890482
        • Fatet A.
        • Pellicer-Rubio M.
        • Leboeuf B.
        Reproductive cycle of goats.
        Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011; 124: 211-219
        20888155
        • Goetsch A.L.
        • Gipson T.A.
        • Askar A.R.
        • Puchala R.
        Invited review: Feeding behavior of goats.
        J. Anim. Sci. 2010; 88: 361-373
        19783702
      2. Government of Canada. 2015. Goat Milk Production in Canada. Accessed Aug. 24, 2015. http://www.dairyinfo.gc.ca/pdf/prod_goatmilk_can_e.pdf.

        • Haenlein G.F.W.
        Past, present, and future perspectives of small ruminant dairy research.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2001; 84: 2097-2115
        11573791
        • Hatziminaoglou Y.
        • Boyazoglu J.
        The goat in ancient civilisations: From the Fertile Crescent to the Aegean Sea.
        Small Rumin. Res. 2004; 51: 123-129
        • Huzzey J.M.
        • DeVries T.J.
        • Valois P.
        • von Keyserlingk M.A.G.
        Stocking density and feed barrier design affect the feeding and social behavior of dairy cattle.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2006; 89: 126-133
        16357274
        • Jaster E.H.
        Evaluation of quality, quantity, and timing of colostrum feeding on immunoglobulin G1 absorption in Jersey calves.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2005; 88: 296-302
        15591392
        • Jørgensen G.H.M.
        • Andersen I.L.
        • Bøe K.E.
        Feed intake and social interactions in dairy goats—The effects of feeding space and type of roughage.
        Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007; 107: 239-251
        • Lu C.D.
        Grazing behavior and diet selection of goats.
        Small Rumin. Res. 1988; 1: 205-216
        • Pisoni G.
        • Moroni P.
        • Turin L.
        • Bertoni G.
        Compartmentalization of small ruminant lentivirus between blood and colostrum in infected goats.
        Virology. 2007; 369: 119-130
        17719071
        • Plaizier J.C.
        • Garner T.
        • Droppo T.
        • Whiting T.
        Nutritional practices on Manitoba dairy farms.
        Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2004; 84: 501-509
        • Robison J.D.
        • Stott G.H.
        • DeNise S.K.
        Effects of passive immunity on growth and survival in the dairy heifer.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1988; 71: 1283-1287
        3135297
        • Salama A.A.K.
        • Caja G.
        • Such X.
        • Casals R.
        • Albanell E.
        Effect of pregnancy and extended lactation on milk production in dairy goats milked once daily.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2005; 88: 3894-3904
        16230695
        • Silanikove N.
        • Leitner G.
        • Merin U.
        • Prosser C.G.
        Recent advances in exploiting goats’ milk: Quality, safety and production aspects.
        Small Rumin. Res. 2010; 89: 110-124
        • Sova A.D.
        • LeBlanc S.J.
        • McBride B.W.
        • DeVries T.J.
        Associations between herd-level feeding management practices, feed sorting, and milk production in freestall dairy farms.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2013; 96: 4759-4770
        23660144
        • Stonos N.
        • Wootton S.K.
        • Quinton M.
        • Karrow N.
        Seroprevalence of small ruminant lentivirus infection in Ontario goat herds.
        Small Rumin. Res. 2013; 114: 284-288
        • Weaver D.M.
        • Tyler J.W.
        • VanMetre D.C.
        • Hostetler D.E.
        • Barrington G.M.
        Passive transfer of colostral immunoglobulins in calves.
        J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2000; 14: 569-577
        11110376