Advertisement
Research| Volume 33, ISSUE 3, P342-348, June 2017

Download started.

Ok

Effect of brachytic dwarf forage sorghum or corn silage harvested in the summer or fall and supplemented with soybean meal or mechanically pressed cottonseed meal on performance of lactating dairy cows

      ABSTRACT

      A 6-wk randomized design trial with a 4 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments was conducted to evaluate the production response of 48 Holstein lactating cows fed diets based on corn or forage sorghum silage harvested in the summer or fall and supplemented with soybean meal (SBM) or mechanically pressed cottonseed meal (CSM). Corn was planted in April and harvested in July (CSS), and a second crop was planted in August and harvested in November (CSF). Forage sorghum was planted in April, harvested in July (FSS), allowed to ratoon, and harvested again in November. Forages provided 41.67% of the dietary DM in the experimental diets, and CSM replaced a portion of the N provided by SBM. Cows were fed a corn silage–based diet for 2 wk before beginning the 4-wk experimental period. No differences were observed in DMI or milk yield among treatments. An interaction of forage source and protein supplement was observed for milk fat, which was lowest for CSF-CSM compared with the other treatments. No differences were observed in yield or concentration of milk protein, lactose, or solids-not-fat. An interaction was observed for efficiency of milk production, which was lowest for CSS-SBM and CSF-CSM compared with the other treatments. Concentrations of milk urea nitrogen were less for diets based on corn silage compared with forage sorghum and for CSM compared with SBM. Results of this trial indicate that diets based on corn silage or forage sorghum harvested in spring or fall and supplemented with CSM or SBM can support similar performance.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      LITERATURE CITED

        • AOAC International
        Official Methods of Analysis.
        17th ed. AOAC Int, Arlington, VA2000
        • Aydin G.
        • Grant R.J.
        • O’Rear J.
        Brown midrib sorghum in diets for lactating dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1999; 82: 2127-2135
        • Bean B.
        • McCollum F.
        • McCuistion K.
        • Robinson J.
        • Villareal B.
        • VanMeter R.
        2005 Texas Panhandle forage sorghum silage trial.
        2005 (Accessed Jan. 8, 2012)
        • Bean B.W.
        • McCollum III, F.T.
        Forage sorghum silage vs corn silage. Pages 113–114 in Southern Conserv. Syst. Conf.
        Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Amarillo, TX2005
        • Bernard J.K.
        Milk production and composition responses to the source of protein supplements in diets containing wheat middlings.
        9178134
        J. Dairy Sci. 1997; 80: 938-942
        • Bernard J.K.
        Fuguay J.W. Fox P.F. McSweeney P.L.H. Oilseed and oilseed meal. Pages 349–355 in Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences. 2nd ed. vol. 2. Acad. Press, London, United Kingdom2011
        • Bernard J.K.
        • Tao S.
        Short communication: Production response of lactating dairy cows to brachytic forage sorghum silage compared with corn silage from first or second harvest.
        26454290
        J. Dairy Sci. 2015; 98: 8994-9000
        • Brito A.F.
        • Broderick G.A.
        Effects of different protein supplements on milk production and nutrient utilization in lactating dairy cows.
        17369223
        J. Dairy Sci. 2007; 90: 1816-1827
        • Brito A.F.
        • Broderick G.A.
        • Reynal S.M.
        Effects of different protein supplements on omasal nutrient flow and microbial protein synthesis in lactating dairy cows.
        17369224
        J. Dairy Sci. 2007; 90: 1828-1841
        • Brunette T.
        • Baurhoo B.
        • Mustafa A.F.
        Replacing corn silage with different forage millet silage cultivars: Effects on milk yield, nutrient digestion, and ruminal fermentation of lactating dairy cows.
        25108857
        J. Dairy Sci. 2014; 97: 6440-6449
        • Colombini S.
        • Galassi G.
        • Crovetto G.M.
        • Rapetti L.
        Milk production, nitrogen balance, and fiber digestibility prediction of corn, whole plant grain sorghum, and forage sorghum silage in the dairy cow.
        22818460
        J. Dairy Sci. 2012; 95: 4457-4467
        • Contreras-Govea F.
        • Marsalis M.A.
        • Lauriault L.M.
        • Bean B.W.
        Forage sorghum nutritive value: A review. Forage and Grazinglands.
        2010
        10.1094/FG-2010-0125-01-RV
        • Dann H.M.
        • Grant R.J.
        • Cotanch K.W.
        • Thomas E.D.
        • Ballard C.S.
        • Rice R.
        Comparison of brown midrib sorghum-sudangrass with corn silage on lactational performance and nutrient digestibility in Holstein dairy cows.
        18218754
        J. Dairy Sci. 2008; 91: 663-672
        • Goering H.K.
        • Van Soest P.J.
        Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). Agric. Handbook 379.
        ARS-USDA, Washington, DC1970
        • Grant R.J.
        • Haddan S.G.
        • Moore K.J.
        • Pedersen J.F.
        Brown midrib sorghum silage for midlactation dairy cows.
        8550907
        J. Dairy Sci. 1995; 78: 1970-1980
        • Meyer M.J.
        • Shirley J.E.
        • Titgemeyer E.C.
        • Park A.F.
        • VanBaale M.J.
        Effect of mechanical processing and fat removal on the nutrient value of cottonseed for lactating dairy cows.
        11768092
        J. Dairy Sci. 2001; 84: 2503-2514
        • Miron J.
        • Zuckerman E.
        • Adin G.
        • Shoshani R.
        • Nikbachat M.
        • Yosef E.
        • Zenou A.
        • Weinberg A.G.
        • Chen Y.
        • Halachmi I.
        • Ben-Ghedalia D.
        Comparison of two forage sorghum varieties with corn and the effect of feeding their silage on eating behavior and lactation performance of dairy cows.
        Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007; 139: 23-39
        • Nichols S.W.
        • Frotschel M.A.
        • Amos H.E.
        • Ely L.O.
        Effects of fiber from tropical corn and forage sorghum silage on intake, digestion, and performance of lactating dairy cows.
        9785230
        J. Dairy Sci. 1998; 81: 2383-2393
        • NRC
        Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle.
        6th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC1989
        • Oliver A.L.
        • Grant R.J.
        • Pedersen J.F.
        • O’Rear J.
        Comparison of brown midrib-6 and -18 forage sorghum with conventional sorghum and corn silage in diets of lactating dairy cows.
        15202648
        J. Dairy Sci. 2004; 87: 637-644
        • Van Soest P.J.
        • Robertson J.B.
        • Lewis B.A.
        Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.
        1660498
        J. Dairy Sci. 1991; 74: 3583-3597
        • Wildman E.E.
        • Jones G.M.
        • Wagner P.E.
        • Boman R.L.
        • Troutt Jr., H.F.
        • Lesch T.N.
        A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1982; 65: 495-501
        • Yosef E.
        • Carmi A.
        • Nikbachat M.
        • Zenou A.
        • Umiel N.
        • Miron J.
        Characteristics of tall versus short-type varieties of forage sorghum grown under two irrigation levels, for summer, and subsequent fall harvest, and digestibility by sheep of their silage.
        Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2009; 152: 1-11