Advertisement
Research| Volume 34, ISSUE 4, P379-389, August 2018

Download started.

Ok

Effects of using increasingly aggressive implant protocols on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of calf-fed steers

      ABSTRACT

      Three experiments evaluated aggressive implant strategies to better understand implant duration and allow for maximum return on implant investment in feedlot steers. Crossbred steers (n = 1,350; 282 kg initial BW, SD = 8) were fed for an average of 215 d (Exp. 1). Treatments were Revalor-IS (80 mg of trenbolone acetate and 16 mg of estradiol) or Revalor-XS (200 mg of trenbolone acetate and 40 mg of estradiol) initially followed by 1 or 2 consecutive Revalor-200 (200 mg of trenbolone acetate and 20 mg of estradiol) implants (6 replications). Crossbred steers (n = 1,513; 265 kg initial BW, SD = 18) were fed for an average of 208 d (Exp. 2). Treatments were (1) Revalor-G (40 mg of trenbolone acetate and 8 mg of estradiol) on d 0, Revalor-IS on d 50, and Revalor-200 on d 140; (2) Ralgro (36 mg of zeranol) on d 0 and Revalor-XS on d 50; and (3) Revalor-XS on d 0 and Revalor-200 on d 140 (5 replications). Holstein steers (n = 1,832; 144 kg initial BW, SD = 11) were fed for an average of 360 d (Exp. 3). Treatments were (1) Ralgro on d 0, Revalor-IS on d 120, and Revalor-S on d 240; (2) Ralgro on d 0 and Revalor-XS on d 120; (3) Ralgro on d 0, Revalor-IS on d 60, and Revalor-XS on d 160; and (4) Revalor-XS on d 0 and Revalor-XS on d 160 (6 replications). In all 3 experiments, final BW, ADG, and HCW were not affected by treatment (P ≥ 0.12). Increasingly aggressive implant protocols have limited effects on feedlot and carcass performance of beef and Holstein steers.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      LITERATURE CITED

        • Apple J.K.
        • Dikeman M.E.
        • Simms D.D.
        • Kuhl G.
        Effects of synthetic hormone implants, singularly or in combinations, on performance, carcass traits, and longissimus muscle palatability of Holstein steers.
        1752819
        J. Anim. Sci. 1991; 69: 4437-4448
        • Brandt Jr, R.T.
        Factors affecting release rates and blood levels of hormones from steroidal implants.
        in: Pages 34–39 Proc. Symp. Impact Implant Perf. Carcass Value Beef Cattle Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK1997
        • Bruns K.W.
        • Pritchard R.H.
        • Boggs D.L.
        The effect of stage of growth and implant exposure on performance and carcass composition in steers.
        15583049
        J. Anim. Sci. 2005; 83: 108-116
        • Duckett S.K.
        • Pratt S.L.
        Meat science and muscle biology symposium—Anabolic implants and meat quality.
        24243897
        J. Anim. Sci. 2014; 92: 3-9
        • FASS
        Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching.
        3rd rev. FASS Inc., Champaign, IL2010
        • Folmer J.D.
        • Farran T.B.
        • Erickson G.E.
        • Klopfenstein T.J.
        • Reinhardt C.D.
        • Dicke B.D.
        • Drouillard J.S.
        • Streeter M.N.
        • Vasconcelos J.T.
        Evaluation of Revalor-IH and Revalor-IS as initial implants compared with traditional initial implants for finishing heifers and steers.
        Prof. Anim. Sci. 2009; 25: 580-585
        • Guiroy P.J.
        • Tedeschi L.O.
        • Fox D.G.
        • Hutcheson J.P.
        The effects of implant strategy on finished body weight of beef cattle.
        12162646
        J. Anim. Sci. 2002; 80: 1791-1800
        • Hilscher F.H.
        • Streeter M.N.
        • Vander Pol K.J.
        • Dicke B.D.
        • Cooper R.J.
        • Jordon D.J.
        • Scott T.L.
        • Bogstad A.R.
        • Peterson R.E.
        • Depenbusch B.E.
        • Erickson G.E.
        Effect of increasing initial implant dosage on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of long-fed steer and heifer calves.
        Prof. Anim. Sci. 2016; 32: 53-62
        • Johnson B.J.
        • Ribeiro F.R.B.
        • Beckett J.L.
        Application of growth technologies in enhancing food security and sustainability.
        Anim. Front. 2013; 3: 8-13
        • Mader T.L.
        • Dalquist J.M.
        • Sindt M.H.
        • Stock R.A.
        • Klopfenstein T.J.
        Effect of sequential implanting with Synovex on steer and heifer performance.
        8056653
        J. Anim. Sci. 1994; 72: 1095-1100
        • Meyer H.H.D.
        Biochemistry and physiology of anabolic hormones used for improvement of meat production.
        11297191
        APMIS. 2001; 109: 1-8
        • Montgomery T.H.
        • Drew P.F.
        • Brown M.S.
        Optimizing carcass value and the use of anabolic implants in beef cattle.
        J. Anim. Sci. 2002; 79: E296-E306
        • Nichols C.A.
        • Erickson G.E.
        • Vasconcelos J.T.
        • Streeter M.N.
        • Dicke B.D.
        • Jordon D.J.
        • Cooper R.J.
        • Scott T.L.
        • Klopfenstein T.J.
        Comparison of Revalor XS a new single-dose implant, to a Revalor IS and Revalor S implant strategy in finishing steers.
        Prof. Anim. Sci. 2014; 30: 51-55
        • Parr S.L.
        • Chung K.Y.
        • Hutcheson J.P.
        • Nichols W.T.
        • Yates D.A.
        • Streeter M.N.
        • Swingle R.S.
        • Galyean M.L.
        • Johnson B.J.
        Dose and release pattern of anabolic implants affects growth of finishing beef steers across days on feed.
        21097688
        J. Anim. Sci. 2011; 89: 863-873
        • Perry T.C.
        • Fox D.G.
        • Beermann D.H.
        Effect of an implant of trenbolone acetate and estradiol on growth, feed efficiency, and carcass composition of Holstein and beef steers.
        1808166
        J. Anim. Sci. 1991; 69: 4696-4702
        • Preston R.L.
        Hormone containing growth-promotant implants: Managing the tools.
        Vet Clinic. Food Anim. Pract. 1999; 23: 309-319
        • Pritchard R.H.
        Effect of implant strategies on feedlot performance and carcass traits of steers.
        in: Pages 57–61 and Paper 17 in South Dakota State Beef Report, 1994 South Dakota State Univ., Brookings1994
        • Reinhardt C.D.
        Growth-promotant implants: Managing the tools.
        17606153
        Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2007; 23: 309-319
        • Roeber D.L.
        • Cannell R.C.
        • Belk K.E.
        • Tatum J.D.
        • Smith G.C.
        Implant strategies during feeding: Impact on carcass grades and consumer acceptability.
        10907829
        J. Anim. Sci. 2000; 78: 1867-1874
        • Samber J.A.
        • Tatum J.D.
        • Wray M.I.
        • Nichols W.T.
        • Morgan J.B.
        • Smith G.C.
        Implant program effects on performance and carcass quality of steer calves finished for 212 days.
        8818790
        J. Anim. Sci. 1996; 74: 1470-1476
        • Scheffler J.M.
        • Buskirk D.D.
        • Rust S.R.
        • Cowley J.D.
        • Doumit M.E.
        Effect of repeated administration of combination trenbolone acetate and estradiol implants on growth, carcass traits, and beef quality of long-fed Holstein steers.
        14552364
        J. Anim. Sci. 2003; 81: 2395-2400
        • USDA
        Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef. Agric. Market. Serv.
        USDA, Washington, DC1997

      CHORUS Manuscript

      View Open Manuscript