ABSTRACT
Objective
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
Implications and Applications
Key words
INTRODUCTION
- Seeger J.T.
- King M.E.
- Grotelueschen D.M.
- Rogers G.M.
- Stokka G.S.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Historic Carcass Outcomes from USDA
Retrospective Temporal BRD Patterns in High-Performing and High-Risk Populations
Repeatability of Health Outcomes: Retrospective Health Observations from Noble Research Institute Cooperators
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Historic Carcass Outcomes from the USDA
- Retallick K.J.
- Bormann J.M.
- Weaber R.L.
- MacNeil M.D.
- Bradford H.L.
- Freetly H.C.
- Hales K.E.
- Moser D.W.
- Snelling W.M.
- Thallman R.M.
- Kuehn L.A.

- Krafsur G.M.
- Neary J.M.
- Garry F.
- Holt T.
- Gould D.H.
- Mason G.L.
- Thomas M.G.
- Enns R.M.
- Tuder R.M.
- Heaton M.P.
- Brown R.D.
- Stenmark K.R.
Retrospective Temporal BRD Patterns in High-Performing and High-Risk Populations
Parameter | High performing | High risk |
---|---|---|
Number of lots (no.) | 27 | 171 |
Number of calves received (no.) | 2,405 | 13,597 |
In weight (kg) | 331.7 (298.5, 364.5) | 320.6 (282.2, 358.0) |
ADG (kg/d) | 1.54 (1.41, 1.68) | 1.43 (1.28, 1.60) |
G:F | 0.1520 (0.1425, 0.1627) | 0.1486 (0.1415, 0.1623) |
Out weight (kg) | 611.7 (594.7, 629.3) | 588.2 (553.9, 628.2) |
Mortality (%) | 2.54 (1.15, 3.81) | 4.83 (1.67, 6.71) |
Hot carcass weight (kg) | 384.4 (371.5, 393.4) | N/A |
DP (%) | 64.31 (63.84, 64.79) | N/A |
QG prime and choice (%) | 94.78 (92.07, 99.16) | N/A |


Repeatability of Health Outcomes: Retrospective Health Observations from Noble Research Institute Cooperators
- Cernicchiaro N.
- White B.J.
- Renter D.G.
- Babcock A.H.
- Kelly L.
- Slattery R.
- Cernicchiaro N.
- White B.J.
- Renter D.G.
- Babcock A.H.
- Kelly L.
- Slattery R.
- Holland B.P.
- Burciaga-Robles L.O.
- VanOverbeke D.L.
- Shook J.N.
- Step D.L.
- Richards C.J.
- Krehbiel C.R.


APPLICATIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
LITERATURE CITED
- A mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of metaphylaxis treatments for bovine respiratory disease in beef cattle..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2016.106228380607J. Anim. Sci. 2017; 95: 626-635
- Effect of transportation and commingling on the acute-phase protein response, growth, and feed intake of newly weaned beef calves..https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8151120x12772837J. Anim. Sci. 2003; 81: 1120-1125
- Temporal distributions of respiratory disease events within cohorts of feedlot cattle and associations with cattle health and performance indices..https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.09.00320947196Prev. Vet. Med. 2010; 97: 198-219
- Economic effects of bovine respiratory disease on feedlot cattle during backgrounding and finishing phases..https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30474-5Prof. Anim. Sci. 2011; 27: 195-203
- Association between changes in eating and drinking behaviors and respiratory tract disease in newly arrived calves at a feedlot..https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.116311039541Am. J. Vet. Res. 2000; 61: 1163-1168
- Associations between the distance traveled from sale barns to commercial feedlots in the United States and overall performance, risk of respiratory disease, and cumulative mortality in feeder cattle during 1997 to 2009..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-459922247119J. Anim. Sci. 2012; 90 (a): 1929-1939
- Effects of body weight loss during transit from sale barns to commercial feedlots on health and performance in feeder cattle cohorts arriving to feedlots from 2000 to 2008..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-460022247120J. Anim. Sci. 2012; 90 (b): 1940-1947
- Review: Basic principles and economics of transportation shrink in beef cattle..https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31636-3Prof. Anim. Sci. 2001; 17: 247-255
- Preconditioning calves for the feedlot..https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(15)31333-53878212Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 1985; 1: 401-411
- Adipocyte, adipose tissue, and infectious disease..https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01455-0617118983Infect. Immun. 2007; 75: 1066-1078
- Comparative pulmonary mechanics in the horse and the cow..https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-5288(18)31174-32740626Res. Vet. Sci. 1989; 46: 322-330
- Health of finishing steers: Effects on performance, carcass traits, and meat tenderness..https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.77123168x10641860J. Anim. Sci. 1999; 77: 3168-3175
- Economic impact associated with respiratory disease in beef cattle..https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30302-99368983Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 1997; 13: 367-377
- Associations between prior management of cattle and risk of bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle..https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.02.00627094138Prev. Vet. Med. 2016; 127: 37-43
- Management of preconditioned calves and impacts of preconditioning..https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2015.03.00226139187Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2015; 31: 197-207
- Effect of bovine respiratory disease during preconditioning on subsequent feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and beef attributes..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-242820190167J. Anim. Sci. 2010; 88: 2486-2499
- Pulmonary arterial pressure testing for high mountain disease in cattle..10.1016/j.cvfa.2007.08.001Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2007; 23: 575-596
- Cardiopulmonary remodeling in fattened beef cattle: A naturally occurring large animal model of obesity-associated pulmonary hypertension with left heart disease..https://doi.org/10.1177/204589401879680430124135Pulm. Circ. 2019; 9: 1-13
Kuehn, L. A., and R. M. Thallman. 2016. Across-breed EPD tables for the year 2016 adjusted to breed differences for birth year of 2014. Pages 127–154 in Beef Improve. Fed. Annu. Conv. Beef Improve. Fed., South Verona, MS.
- Weaning weight trends in the US beef cattle industry..https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2018-01797Appl. Anim. Sci. 2019; 35: 57-65
- The altitude at which a calf is born and raised influences the rate at which mean pulmonary arterial pressure increases with age..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-921726523564J. Anim. Sci. 2015; 93 (a): 4714-4720
- Mean pulmonary arterial pressures in Angus steers increase from cow-calf to feedlot-finishing phases..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-904826440165J. Anim. Sci. 2015; 93 (b): 3854-3861
- The effect of market forces on bovine respiratory disease..https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2020.03.00832451038Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2020; 36: 497-508
- Relationship of various incoming cattle traits with feedlot performance and carcass traits..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-129319465501J. Anim. Sci. 2009; 87: 3030-3042
- Genetic variance and covariance and breed differences for feed intake and average daily gain to improve feed efficiency in growing cattle..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.126028464090J. Anim. Sci. 2017; 95: 1444-1450
- Adipocytes as regulators of energy balance and glucose homeostasis..https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0548317167472Nature. 2006; 444: 847-853
- Effect of management, marketing, and certified health programs on the sale price of beef calves sold through a livestock video auction service from 1995 through 2009..https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.239.4.45121838583J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2011; 239: 451-466
- Inheritance of pulmonary arterial pressure in Angus cattle and its correlation with growth..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-027018156358J. Anim. Sci. 2008; 86: 815-819
- The epidemiology of bovine respiratory disease: What is the evidence for predisposing factors?.21197200Can. Vet. J. 2010; 51: 1095-1102
- Effects of weather variables on thermoregulation of calves during periods of extreme heat..https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.75.3.29624564316Am. J. Vet. Res. 2014; 75: 296-300
- Effect of live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii CNCM I-1079) feed additive on health and growth parameters of high-risk heifers in a commercial feedlot..10.21423/bovine-vol53no2p117-127Bov. Pract. 2019; 53: 117-127
- Using feedlot operational data to make valid conclusions for improving health management..https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2015.05.00426210763Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2015; 31: 495-508
USDA. 2000. Feedlot ’99: Part I: Baseline References of Feedlot Management Practices, 1999. USDA, Anim. Plant Health Ins. Serv., Natl. Anim. Health Monit. Syst., Fort Collins, CO.
USDA. 2013. Feedlot 2011: Part III: Trends in health and management practices on U.S. feedlots, 1994–2011. USDA, Anim. Plant Health Ins. Serv., Vet. Serv., Natl. Anim. Health Monit. Syst., Fort Collins, CO.
USDA. 2019a. Agriculture Marketing Service: Meat Grading Reports. USDA, Washington, DC.
USDA. 2019b. Economic Research Services: Livestock and Poultry Live and Dressed Weights. USDA, Washington, DC.
USDA. 2019c. National Agriculture Statistics Services: Cattle. USDA, Washington, DC.
- A retrospective evaluation of animal mortality in US feedlots: Rate, timing, and cause of death..10.21423/bovine-vol49no2p113-123Bov. Pract. 2015; 49: 113-123
- Analysis of modern technologies commonly used in beef cattle production: conventional beef production versus nonconventional production using meta-analysis..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-177819617517J. Anim. Sci. 2009; 87: 3418-3426
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy