ABSTRACT
Objective
Our objective was to evaluate the effects of grazing method on beef cattle performance,
residue characteristics, and subsequent corn grain yields.
Materials and Methods
This was a 3-yr study in which strip-grazing (SG), continuous grazing (CG), and ungrazed
control (CT) treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with 3
replications per year on a continuous corn production system in central Illinois.
Strip-grazed plots were divided into subplots (1, 2, 3) in which cattle back-grazed.
Thirty-six spring-calving, multiparous, Angus cows were used in the first and second
year of the study and 42 winter-calving Angus heifers were used in the third year.
Cattle grazed for 42 d each year following corn harvest.
Results and Discussion
Cattle in SG plots were 9.8 kg heavier (P = 0.05) postgrazing compared with those on CG plots but did not differ (P = 0.77) in final BCS, indicating adequate performance was maintained regardless of
treatment. The SG and CG plots had increased ADF (P = 0.03) and decreased CP (P < 0.01) after grazing compared with CT. In year 2 postgrazing, SG and CG had decreased
(P < 0.01) total residue availability, leaves and husks, and cobs compared with CT,
suggesting more digestible, nutrient-dense components were selected during grazing.
No differences (P = 0.16) were detected for corn yield among grazing treatments. However, yield was
different (P = 0.05) among strips. Strip 1 had lower yields than strip 2, which may have been
due to increased cattle trafficking in this area.
Implications and Applications
Both grazing methods resulted in acceptable performance. Grazing corn residue did
not affect subsequent crop yields; however, strip differences in yield within strip-grazed
paddocks warrant further investigation.
Key words
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe toAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
LITERATURE CITED
- Effect of cattle and sheep treading on surface configuration of a sedimentary hill soil..https://doi.org/10.1071/SR97014Soil Res. 1999; 37: 743-760
- Soil surface property and soybean yield response to corn stover grazing..https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.1364Agron. J. 2004; 96: 1364-1371
- Spatial distribution of inorganic nitrogen in pastures as affected by management, landscape, and cattle locus..https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2018.06.024130512066J. Environ. Qual. 2018; 47: 1468-1477
Drewnoski, M. E., J. C. MacDonald, G. E. Erickson, K. Hanford, and T. J. Klopfenstein. 2016. Long-term corn residue grazing improves subsequent soybean yields in a corn-soybean rotation. Crop Forage Turfgrass Mgmt. https://doi.org/10.2134/cftm2015.0192.
- Pasture yield and soil physical property responses to soil compaction from treading and grazing-A review..https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07125Aust. J. Soil Res. 2008; 46: 237-256
FASS. 2010. Beef cattle. In Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching. 3rd ed. Fed. Anim. Sci. Soc.
- Yield and quality components of corn crop residues and Utilization of these residues by grazing cattle..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1989.672597x2703454J. Anim. Sci. 1989; 67: 597-605
- Changes in availability and nutritive value of different corn residue parts as affected by early and late grazing seasons..https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6941741x2071529J. Anim. Sci. 1991; 69: 1741-1750
- Grazing management and microclimate effects on cattle..https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-09-00045.1Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 2010; 63: 572-580
- Integration of high resolution remotely sensed data and machine learning techniques for spatial prediction of soil properties and corn yield..https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.07.016Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018; 153: 213-225
- Corn residues in beef production systems..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.6541139xJ. Anim. Sci. 1987; 65: 1139-1148
- Effects of animal traffic on soil compaction in wheat pastures..https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1989.0246J. Prod. Agric. 1989; 2: 246-249
- Compositional changes in corn crop residues grazed by gestating beef cows..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1981.525954xJ. Anim. Sci. 1981; 52: 954-958
- Soil compaction under grazing of annual and perennial forages..https://doi.org/10.4141/S97-100Can. J. Soil Sci. 1999; 79: 191-199
- Critical control points for profitability in the cow-calf enterprise..https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31643-0Prof. Anim. Sci. 2001; 17: 295-302
- Starter fertilizer and the method and rate of potassium fertilizer effects on cotton grown on soils with and without winter grazing by cattle..https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629709369826Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1997; 28: 739-746
NRC. 2000. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl Acad. Press.
Parr, J. F., and R. I. Papendick. 1978. Factors affecting the decomposition of crop residues by microorganisms. Chapter 6 in Crop Residue Management Systems. W. Oschwald, ed. Am. Soc. Agron., Crop Sci. Soc. Am., and Soil Sci. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub31.c6.
- Production and use of stockpiled tall fescue to reduce beef cattle production costs..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.00.079ES1001iJ. Anim. Sci. 2000; 79: 1-11
- Grazing crop residues has less impact in the short-term on soil properties than baling in the Central Great Plains..https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.03.0224Agron. J. 2019; 111: 109-121
Rayburn, E., A. O. Abaye, B. F. Tracey, and M. A. Sanderson. 2007. Assessing species composition and forage quality. In Forage Utilization for Pasture-Based Livestock Production, NRAES-173. Nat. Resour. Agric. Eng. Serv.
- Effects of grazing allowance and system on the use of corn-crop residues by gestating beef cows..https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.7151256x8505258J. Anim. Sci. 1993; 71: 1256-1265
Soil Survey Staff. 2012. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Accessed Jul. 15, 2015. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.
- Corn residue stocking rate affects cattle performance but not subsequent grain yield..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-925926523590J. Anim. Sci. 2015; 93: 4977-4983
- Soil compaction, yield response, and soil nutrient pool dynamics within an integrated crop-livestock system in Illinois..https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.07.0390Crop Sci. 2008; 48: 1211-1218
- Baling or grazing of corn residue does not reduce crop production in central United States..https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.04.0226Agron. J. 2019; 111: 122-127
- Utilization of corn and grain sorghum residues in beef cow forage systems..https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.463831xJ. Anim. Sci. 1978; 46: 831-840
- Effect of soil erosion on crop yield in Indiana: Results of a 10 year study..J. Soil Water Conserv. 1994; 49: 597-600
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
July 23,
2021
Received:
December 16,
2020
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Identification
Copyright
© 2021 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
