Advertisement

Can early weaning calves of first-calf heifers improve long-term herd and financial performance in a vertically integrated beef production system? A study application using system dynamics

      ABSTRACT

      Objectives

      The objectives were to (a) evaluate whether marginal reproductive gains from early weaning (EW) calves of first-calf replacement heifers extend throughout the animal’s productive life and (b) compare via cost–benefit analysis EW with conventional weaning (CW) practices on a vertically integrated ranch in Florida, USA.

      Materials and Methods

      A system dynamics model was developed to evaluate CW versus EW of calves from replacement heifers that calve in the first 21 or 42 d of the calving season. A combination of sensitivity analyses and deterministic management tests (EW vs. CW and 21- vs. 42-d calving seasons) were simulated and compared across a range of 18 production and financial metrics, including net present value, over the useful life of one generation of replacement heifers. We hypothesized that EW calves from replacement heifers would improve reproductive performance, resulting in greater total calves produced and, therefore, improved cow-calf and whole-system profitability.

      Results and Discussion

      The 42-d calving criteria for EW created significant production and financial gains and outperformed the 21-d calving criteria. Counterintuitively, these gains did not arise in the cow-calf or feedyard segments (which saw financial declines) but in the stocker segment due to more efficient livestock gains facilitated by lower weaning weights of incoming calves. Sensitivity analyses corroborated these trade-offs. Feedyard sale price (i.e., value received for finished cattle) was the most influential factor influencing whole-system profitability.

      Implications and Applications

      Trade-offs and incentives between enterprises may provide misleading feedback and mask changes that improve the system as a whole (e.g., EW reduced calf weaning weights and reinforced the reproductive performance pressure on management; gains at the stocker segment may mask EW benefits at the cow-calf level, making the cow-calf enterprise more reliant on short-term adjustments, a behavior known as “shifting the burden”).

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      LITERATURE CITED

        • Ackoff R.
        Systems thinking and thinking systems..
        https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100206
        Syst. Dyn. Rev. 1994; 10: 175-188
      1. Arthington, J. D. 2016. Interview by Jase Taylor. Center Director and Professor, University of Florida.

        • Arthington J.D.
        • Minton J.E.
        The effect of early calf weaning on feed intake, growth, and postpartum interval in thin, Brahman-crossbred primiparous cows..
        https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31269-9
        Prof. Anim. Sci. 2004; 20: 34-38
      2. Arthington, J. D., and J. M. Vendramini. 2013. Early-Weaning Beef Calves at 70–90 Days of Age. Southwest Nutr. Conf., Tucson, AZ.

        • Arthington J.D.
        • Kalmbacher R.S.
        Effects of early-weaning on the performance of three-year-old, first-calf beef heifers and calves reared in the subtropics..
        https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8151136x
        12772839
        J. Anim. Sci. 2003; 81: 1136-1141
      3. Bischoff, K., V. Mercadante, and G.C. Lamb. 2015. Management of Postpartum Anestrus in Beef Cows. Anim. Sci. Dept., UF/IFAS Ext.

        • Cronin M.A.
        • Gonzalez C.
        • Sterman J.D.
        Why don’t well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens..
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.03.003
        Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2009; 108: 116-130
        • Cushman R.A.
        • Kill L.K.
        • Funston R.N.
        • Mousel E.M.
        • Perry G.A.
        Heifer calving date positively influences calf weaning weights through six parturitions..
        https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6465
        23825337
        J. Anim. Sci. 2013; 91: 4486-4491
        • DeRouen S.M.
        • Franke D.E.
        Effects of sire breed, breed type and age and weight at breeding on calving rate and date in beef heifers first exposed at three ages..
        https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1989.6751128x
        J. Anim. Sci. 1989; 67: 1128-1137
        • Galindo-Gonzalez S.
        • Arthington J.D.
        • Yelich J.V.
        • Hansen G.R.
        • Lamb G.C.
        • De Vries A.
        Effects of cow parity on voluntary hay intake and performance response to early-weaning of beef calves..
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.10.014
        Livest. Sci. 2007; 110: 148-153
        • Glasscock S.N.
        • Grant W.E.
        • Drawe D.L.
        Simulation of vegetation dynamics and management strategies on south Texas, semi-arid rangeland..
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.019
        15854730
        J. Environ. Manage. 2005; 75: 379-397
      4. Hersom, M. 2013. Basic Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cows. Univ. Florida IFAS Ext.

        • Johnson S.K.
        • Funston R.N.
        Postbreeding heifer management..
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2013.07.002
        24182439
        Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2013; 29: 627-641
      5. Kunkle, W. E., S. S. Robert, and D. O. Rae. 1998. Effects of Body Condition on Productivity in Beef Cattle. Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences. Accessed Mar. 2016. https://ufdc.ufl.edu/IR00004528/00001.

        • Lusby K.S.
        • Wettemann R.P.
        • Turman E.J.
        Effects of early-weaning calves from first-calf heifers on calf and heifer performance..
        https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1981.5351193x
        J. Anim. Sci. 1981; 53: 1193-1197
        • Martins P.G.M.A.
        • Arthington J.D.
        • Cooke R.F.
        • Lamb C.G.
        • Araujo D.B.
        • Torres C.A.A.
        • Guimaraes J.D.
        • Mancio A.B.
        Evaluation of beef cow and calf separation systems to improve reproductive performance of first-calf cows..
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.08.003
        Livest. Sci. 2012; 150: 74-79
      6. Meadows, D. 2010, January. Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. Accessed Nov. 12, 2017. https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/article/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/.

        • Myers S.E.
        • Faulkner D.B.
        • Ireland F.A.
        • Berger L.L.
        • Parrett D.F.
        Production systems comparing early weaning to normal weaning with or without creep feeding for beef steers..
        https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.772300x
        10100657
        J. Anim. Sci. 1999; 77 (a): 300-310
        • Myers S.E.
        • Faulkner D.B.
        • Ireland F.A.
        • Parret D.F.
        Comparison of three weaning ages on cow-calf performance and steer carcass traits..
        https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.772300x
        10100659
        J. Anim. Sci. 1999; 77 (b): 323-329
        • Myers S.E.
        • Faulkner D.B.
        • Nash T.G.
        • Berger L.L.
        • Parrett D.F.
        • McKeith F.K.
        Performance and carcass traits of early-weaned steers receiving either a pasture growing period or a finishing diet at weaning..
        https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.772311x
        10100658
        J. Anim. Sci. 1999; 77 (c): 311-322
        • Nicholson C.F.
        • Peixoto Simões A.R.
        • LaPierre P.A.
        • Van Amburgh M.E.
        ASN-ASAS Symposium: Future of Data Analytics in Nutrition: Modeling complex problems with system dynamics: Applications in animal agriculture..
        https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz105
        30923803
        J. Anim. Sci. 2019; 97: 1903-1920
        • Odhiambo J.F.
        • Rhinehart J.D.
        • Helmondollar R.
        • Pritchard J.Y.
        • Osborne P.I.
        • Felton E.E.
        • Dailey R.A.
        Effects of weaning regimen on energy profiles and reproductive performance of beef cows..
        https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1138
        19359512
        J. Anim. Sci. 2009; 87: 2428-2436
        • Payne C.A.
        • Vander Ley B.
        • Poock S.E.
        Setting the stage for long-term reproductive health..
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2013.07.006
        24182434
        Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2013; 29: 555-565
        • Perry G.A.
        • Cushman R.
        Effect of age at puberty/conception date on cow longevity..
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2013.07.011
        24182436
        Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2013; 29: 579-590
        • Peterson G.A.
        • Turner T.B.
        • Irvin K.M.
        • Davis M.E.
        • Newland H.W.
        • Harvey W.R.
        Cow and calf performance and economic considerations of early-weaning of fall-born beef calves..
        https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.64115x
        J. Anim. Sci. 1987; 64: 15-22
      7. Rasby, R. 2011. Early-Weaning Beef Calves Sometimes Makes Sense. Inst. Agric. Nat. Res.

        • Roberts A.
        • Petersen M.
        • Funston R.
        Beef Species Symposium: Can we build the cowherd by increasing longevity of females?.
        https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8811
        26440322
        J. Anim. Sci. 2015; 93: 4235-4243
      8. Senge, P. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday/Currency.

        • Teague W.R.
        • Grant W.E.
        • Kreuter U.P.
        • Diaz-Solis H.
        • Dube S.
        • Kothmann M.M.
        • Pinchak W.E.
        • Ansley R.J.
        An ecological economic simulation model for assessing fire and grazing management effects on mesquite rangelands in Texas..
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.010
        Ecol. Econ. 2008; 64: 611-624
        • Tedeschi L.O.
        Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models..
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.11.004
        Agric. Syst. 2006; 89: 225-247
        • Tedeschi L.O.
        Mathematical modeling in ruminant nutrition: Approaches and paradigms, extant models, and thoughts for upcoming predictive analytics..
        https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz092
        30882142
        J. Anim. Sci. 2019; 97: 1921-1944
        • Thrift F.A.
        • Thrift T.A.
        Ramifications of weaning spring and fall born calves early or late relative to weaning at conventional ages..
        https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31353-X
        Prof. Anim. Sci. 2004; 20: 490-502
        • Tinsley T.L.
        • Chumbley S.
        • Mathis C.
        • Machen R.
        • Turner B.L.
        Managing cow herd dynamics in environments of limited forage productivity and livestock marketing channels: An application to semi-arid Pacific island beef production using system dynamics..
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.02.014
        Agric. Syst. 2019; 173: 78-93
        • Turner B.
        • Menendez H.
        • Gates R.
        • Tedeschi L.
        • Atzori A.
        System dynamics modeling for agricultural and natural resource management issues: Review of some past cases and forecasting future roles..
        https://doi.org/10.3390/resources5040040
        Resources. 2016; 5 (a): 40
        • Turner B.
        • Rhoades R.
        • Tedeschi L.
        • Hanagriff R.
        • McCuistion K.
        • Dunn B.
        Analyzing ranch profitability from varying cow sales and heifer replacement rates for beef cow-calf production using system dynamics..
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.07.009
        Agric. Syst. 2013; 114: 6-14
        • Turner B.L.
        Model laboratories: A quick-start guide for design of simulation experiments for dynamic systems models..
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109246
        Ecol. Modell. 2020; 434
        • Turner B.L.
        • Goodman M.
        • Machen R.
        • Mathis C.
        • Rhoades R.
        • Dunn B.H.
        Results of beer game trials played by natural resource managers versus students: Does age influence ordering decisions?.
        https://doi.org/10.3390/systems8040037
        Systems. 2020; 8: 37
        • Turner B.L.
        • Tidwell V.
        • Fernald A.
        • Rivera J.A.
        • Rodriguez S.
        • Guldan S.
        • Ochoa C.
        • Hurd B.
        • Boykin K.
        • Cibils A.
        Modeling acequia irrigation systems using system dynamics: Model development, evaluation, and sensitivity analyses to investigate effects of socio-economic and biophysical feedbacks..
        https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101019
        Sustainability (Basel). 2016; 8 (b): 1019
        • Turner B.L.
        • Wuellner M.
        • Nichols T.
        • Gates R.
        • Tedeschi L.O.
        • Dunn B.H.
        A systems approach to forecast agricultural land transformation and soil environmental risk from economic, policy, and cultural scenarios in the north central United States (2012–2062)..
        https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2017.1288029
        Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2017; 15: 102-123
        • Wiltbank J.N.
        • Warwick E.J.
        • Vernon E.H.
        • Priode B.M.
        Factors affecting net calf crop in beef cattle..
        https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1961.203409x
        J. Anim. Sci. 1961; 20: 409-415